[ausev] Error confidence level of resistor correction VS faultcodes set.

[mark witt]

To Dan P.........Hi Dan email me back at aztexan45 at hotmail.com so that I can 
get your address to send you a CD with tons of stuff on it. Also I just 
wrote Chris B. in Cal. to request more info and see if you can write to him 
directly. Witt


>From: "jtp" <jtp at onr.com>
>Reply-To: AustinEV News Announcements and General 
>Discussion<ausev at austinev.org>
>To: "AustinEV News Announcements and General Discussion" 
><ausev at austinev.org>
>Subject: Re: [ausev] Error confidence level of resistor correction VS 
>faultcodes set.
>Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:18:07 -0700
>
>Mark,
>   I will need to talk directly to the author of EV Battery Replacement
>Manual.  There are some fault-code set error inaccuracies that may trigger
>false positives (or fail to set true fault codes at all),  that come into
>mind when altering the sensor wiring, regarding the discharge profiles
>sensed mathematically, and, the resulting anticipated controlled wattage to
>the Siemens traction motor,  since OEM batteries are not going to be
>rebuilt, and a different battery voltage array is being used. If there is a
>redundant way that this potential is irrelevant, then it would be helpful 
>to
>know those thoughts, in order to ask additional questions.
>    Genisys Scan System does not support the OEM faults on the Ford 
>Electric
>Ranger side of diagnostics, and since pollution does not apply here, OBD I
>does not apply either.
>  I haven't recieved any email on the additional data you mentioned you 
>were
>going to send (as of  Sunday 10 am).
>Dan Petit.
>
>_______________________________________________
>AusEV mailing list
>AusEV at austinev.org
>http://www.austinev.org/mailman/listinfo/ausev