[ausev] Why are converted vehicles excluded from this list?
Gil Dawson
Gil at Gil.Dawson.name
Wed Apr 4 19:58:22 GMT 2007
At 9:45 A -0500 4/4/07, Brian Lasseter wrote:
>We just have to figure out who can change the
>vehicle model list, and have them do it.
Excellent idea. We might get results if we ask nicely.
If we get a flat refusal then we can start the letters and rallies.
What, exactly, would we like for the list to say? Should we propose
a set of standards to define an electric vehicle that doesn't have a
manufacturer's label or model number? Should we suggest who should
have the responsibility of verifying that a particular vehicle meets
these standards? Should we suggest a process for getting changes to
these standards reviewed and approved?
Where does the money come from? My inner capitalist suggests that
the businesses named on the list stand to profit a bit from this
rebate. My inner Nazi suggests that they may have contributed some
small consideration toward its passage. Perhaps we might be consider
doing the same.
Profit and consideration are a little murky in the sale of used cars,
however skilfully they may have been converted to electric drive. We
who drive electric cars would benefit in many ways, most of them
intangible, if electric cars were to become more popular. Should we
ourselves be prepared to pony up a tangible recognition of this
benefit?
--Gil
"Making laws is like making sausage" -- Who said that?
More information about the AusEV
mailing list