[ausev] Series hybrids, article link

Charlesvsi at aol.com Charlesvsi at aol.com
Tue Dec 4 16:25:45 GMT 2007


 
 
Sorry, here is the web link , 
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_hybrid#Series_hybrid_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_hybrid#Series_hybrid)   . 
Chuck S. 
 
In a message dated 12/4/2007 9:23:55 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
careyking1 at gmail.com writes:

Thanks  for all comments on series vs. parallel hybrids.

In terms of the  discussion not being simple - what I am particularly 
interested in is a  complex discussion in some kind of journal paper or 
something  similar.  Being more energy efficient (due to a motor running 
at  constant speed) for a series hybrid but having to figure a way not to 
have  a trailer carrying the generator quite a design tradeoff and the 
basics of  the argument. Not having to size a generator as precisely to 
limit power  demand for a parallel hybrid is an advantage that might 
outweigh higher  efficiency.  It would be interesting to see how each 
design concept  has become more feasible over time and what the limiting 
design factors  are going forward.  The fact that parallel hybrids 
already exist on  the road in a mass manufacturing sense can't be because 
they have no  advantages.

Carey

Charlesvsi at aol.com wrote:
> It's not  quite as simple as series and parallel, because the power 
> train  structure and computer control programming enter into the 
>  discussion.
> For a great overview of Hybrid Vehicle Drivetrain, go to  Wikipedia, 
> the free encyclopedia (redirected from Series  Hybrid).
>  
> Our ''04 Honda Civic Hybrid is another example  of a power 
> assist hybrid. The programming does not allow electric  only driving, 
> but with the CVT (continuously Variable Transmission)  the computer 
> controls the speed of the gas engine, the ratio of the  transmission 
> and amount of electric motor boost. Ours 1.4 liter gas  engine runs at 
> 3000 rpm most of the time, at highest efficient speed  providing 44 
> mpg. When climbing hills in cruise control on, the  electric drive 
> starts to help hold the speed of 73.5 and then the rpm  goes up 
> providing more gas engine power, transmission is changing  ratio to 
> hold the speed. On Montana mountains on I 90,  steep  incline it still 
> holds 73.5 mph but rpm goes up to 4500 while we pass  the trucks etc. 
> going over the hill. Going down the other side the  automatic 
> regenerative braking charges the large batteries getting  ready for 
> next hill.
>  
> ps, we get 36 mpg in town  usually, and over 40 mpg on most highway 
> driving not in  mountains.
>  
> The components of gas engine, electric  motor, transmission, and 
> computer programming determine the  performance and the mileage at any 
> given moment.
>   
> Chuck S.
>  
> In a message dated 12/3/2007 9:09:43  P.M. Central Standard Time, 
> jpenry at texrocks.com  writes:
>
>     The series Hybrid would be more  efficient, from the documentation
>     I  have
>     found.
>     Using fuel  to generate electricity is more efficient than an ICE
>   engine.
>     Parallel only uses the  electric up to 30 or so mph, then the gas
>      engine
>     takes over, so they are only using the  electric for the power in
>     lower
>   speeds, and letting the ICE take over when only 60 or 70 hp  are
>     needed.
>
>     I  believe a series hybrid would get much more mpg than a
>   parallel.  Think
>      locomotives.
>
>
>     ----- Original Message  -----
>     From: "Carey King"  <careyking1 at gmail.com>
>     To: "AustinEV News  Announcements and General Discussion"
>      <ausev at austinev.org>
>     Sent: Monday, December  03, 2007 8:49 PM
>     Subject: Re: [ausev] Series  hybrids
>
>
>     > Does anyone have a  basic Pro and Con description/comparison of
>      parallel
>     > versus series hybrids?
>   >
>     > I kind of thought myself  that the reason Chevy Volt is going for the
>     >  series is that Toyota must hold most of the patents on the  parallel
>     > versions, not that the series is  inherently any better. But I really
>     > don't know  of the advantages and disadvantages of each.
>      >
>     > carey
>      >
>     > John Penry at Texrocks  wrote:
>     >> Somehow, GM thinks that they can  produce a series hybrid in the
>     Volt.
>   >> Maybe
>     >> the Volt is  what the software industry calls "Vaporware"???? 
>      So far, the
>     >> youtube videos show it to be  smoke and mirrors.
>     >>
>   >> I have run across many stories of people who have  created "home
>     made"
>      >> series
>     >> hybrids -- such as the one  about using a turbine engine to power a
>     >>  Hummer,
>     >> and getting 60 to 80  mpg.
>     >>
>     >>  With a 72 mile round trip daily, and no way to charge up, it
>   looks like I
>     >> may have to keep  my 31 mpg Honda.
>     >>
>   >> If someone can build a series hybrid, I would buy  it.  i think
>     they would
>   >> easily get 60 to 80 mpg, and could even be powered by  renewable
>     fuels.
>      >>
>     >> John in Seguin
>   >>
>     >>
>   >> ----- Original Message -----
>      >> From: "Christopher Robison" <chris at ohmbre.org>
>   >> To: <ausev at austinev.org>
>   >> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 5:54 PM
>   >> Subject: Re: [ausev] Series hybrids
>   >>
>     >>
>   >>
>     >>> On Mon,  2007-12-03 at 17:26 -0600, John Penry at Texrocks wrote:
>   >>>
>     >>>> Thanks  for the information.  I have a 36 mile trip each way
>   to work,
>     >>>>  and
>     >>>> no
>      >>>> way to plug in while at work.
>      >>>> I was thinking that creating a series hybrid similar to  the
>     GM Volt,
>      >>>> would
>     >>>> be easier  to do using a pickup, and I had thought that the engine
>   >>>> compartment could be used to place a motor from  a motorcycle,
>     >>>>  snowmobile,
>     >>>> or
>   >>>> small diesel.  After going by and taking a  look at the Ford
>     Rangers on
>   >>>> display this weekend, I'm beginning to wonder  where all that
>     electronic
>   >>>> stuff is going to go.
>      >>>>
>     >>>> I have read the  work on the AC Propulsion Long Ranger, and
>     thought  that
>     >>>> it
>      >>>> could go under the hood, and the batteries - only needing  a
>     40 mile
>      >>>> range
>     >>>> there would  be a savings in weight and space required for the
>      >>>> batteries,
>     >>>>  and
>     >>>> that could be used for the  generator.  Maybe I'll have to
>     wait for  some
>     >>>> of
>      >>>> the electronics to get miniaturized.
>   >>>>
>     >>> The  electronics are not really your problem. Based on lead-acid, a
>   >>> typical conversion filled with batteries with no  space for a
>     generator,
>      >>> usually gets about 35-40 miles.
>      >>>
>     >>> Using lithium (at 10  times the price for the same energy capacity)
>      >>> reduces required volume for the same energy by at least  half,
>     and weight
>      >>> by a factor of 4 or more. This would allow room for  the
>     generator, but
>      >>> probably not one large enough to allow arbitrary range  (just
>     guessing
>      >>> here) if you're limited to options available off the shelf  today.
>     >>>
>      >>> The only way to do this in a small/light enough package  is
>     with a small
>      >>> engine running at very high RPMs (as the Long Ranger did) and  a
>     >>> generator head capable of generating  the appropriate voltage
>     at that
>   >>> speed. As I understand ACP used their (very  expensive) AC150
>     motor for
>   >>> that purpose. I have no idea what the Long Ranger  sounded
>     like, but I'm
>      >>> going to bet that it screamed, and would not last long  in
>     normal use.
>      >>> High power density in a generator is a pretty tough nut  to
>     crack. That
>      >>> Ossa manages it with diesel in under 600 pounds is  pretty
>     impressive in
>      >>> my opinion, but that's still over 15 cubic feet.
>   >>>
>      >>>
>     >>>
>   >>> --
>     >>>  Christopher Robison
>     >>>  chris at ohmbre.org
>     >>>  http://ohmbre.org          <-- 1999 Isuzu Hombre +  Z2K + Warp13!
>     >>>
>   >>>  _______________________________________________
>      >>> AusEV mailing list
>     >>>  AusEV at austinev.org
>     >>>  http://www.austinev.org/mailman/listinfo/ausev
>      >>>
>     >>>
>   >>>
>     >>
>   >>
>     >>  _______________________________________________
>      >> AusEV mailing list
>     >>  AusEV at austinev.org
>     >>  http://www.austinev.org/mailman/listinfo/ausev
>      >>
>     >>
>     >  _______________________________________________
>      > AusEV mailing list
>     >  AusEV at austinev.org
>     >  http://www.austinev.org/mailman/listinfo/ausev
>      >
>     >
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
>   AusEV mailing list
>      AusEV at austinev.org
>      http://www.austinev.org/mailman/listinfo/ausev
>
>  
>  /Chuck Simms/
> Director, North Austin M.U.District #1
> e-mail:  charlesvsi at aol.com
> Phone: 512-331-9630
> Cell:  505-331-1237
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Check out AOL Money & Finance's list of the hottest products 
>  <http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001> 
 
> and top money wasters 
>  
<http://money.aol.com/top5/general/ways-you-are-wasting-money?NCID=aoltop00030000000002>  
> of 2007.
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  _______________________________________________
> AusEV mailing  list
> AusEV at austinev.org
>  http://www.austinev.org/mailman/listinfo/ausev
>    
_______________________________________________
AusEV mailing  list
AusEV at austinev.org
http://www.austinev.org/mailman/listinfo/ausev





Chuck Simms

Director, North Austin M.U.District  #1
e-mail: charlesvsi at aol.com
Phone: 512-331-9630
Cell:  505-331-1237



**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest 
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.austinev.org/pipermail/ausev/attachments/20071204/095d8ce4/attachment.html 


More information about the AusEV mailing list